Google+ Followers

Wednesday, July 06, 2011

Margaret Brownley and A Vision of Lucy

Today I have the privilege of featuring Margaret Brownley on my blog. The third book in the Rocky Creek Series is now available. Let's find out more about Margaret and her book.
BIO:
Thrills, mystery, suspense, romance: Margaret penned it all. Nothing wrong with this—except Margaret happened to be writing for the church newsletter. After making the church picnic read like a Grisham novel, her former pastor took her aside and said, "Maybe God's calling you to write fiction."


So that’s what Margaret did. She now has more than 25 novels and novellas to her credit and has been published in 15 languages. The first book in her Rocky Creek series A Lady Like Sarah was a 2010 Women of Faith selection, and Romance Writers of American RITA finalist. She is currently at work on a new series for Thomas Nelson.

Happily married to her real life hero, Margaret and her husband live in Southern California, and have three grown children.

Book Blurb:
Trouble follows Lucy wherever she goes. So does a vision of second chances…and love.
Lucy Fairbanks dreams of working as a photographer at the Rocky Creek newspaper. If she can earn money making photographs, then maybe her father will see that what she does is worthy, more than just a distraction. And her deepest hope is that he’ll see her as an artist, the way he thought of her deceased mother, whose paintings still hung on their walls.
But trouble follows Lucy on every photo shoot: a mess of petticoats and ribbons, an accidental shooting, even a fire.
When Lucy meets David Wolf—a quiet, rustic man who lives on the outskirts of town—she thinks she can catch the attention of the town with his photograph. She doesn’t count on her feelings stirring whenever she’s near him.
Two things happen next that forever change the course of Lucy’s life. But will these events draw her closer to God or push her further away? And how will David accept this new vision of Lucy?
More Love and Laughter in the Old West
Sage Advice from A VISION OF LUCY
When sitting for a picture a widow should say “kerchunk” to present the appropriate mournful expression. To assure adequate sympathy, compose yourself to look brave or resigned but never happy. A merry widow will only raise eyebrows.
Say Cabbage

In 1850, Julia Shannon of San Francisco took the family portrait to new heights when she shockingly advertised herself as a daguerreotypist and midwife. After reading about her I just had to write about a lady photographer. Of course, the heroine of A Vision of Lucy doesn’t deliver babies but she still finds plenty of ways to get into trouble.

I loved writing about old time photography and have nothing but awe for the brave souls who first took camera in hand. Not only did they contend with unwieldy equipment but also dangerous chemicals and exploding labs.

Women had an advantage over male photographers who were often confounded by female dress. This explains why one photographer advertised in 1861 for an assistant, “Who Understands the Hairdressing Business.” Women also had a few tricks up their leg of mutton sleeves—or rather their skirts. Elizabeth Withington invented a “dark thick dress skirt” to use as a developing tent when she traveled.

Those cheerless faces in early photographs were partly due to vices that held heads still for long periods of time. Photographers used all sorts of devices to hold a client’s interest. One even had a trained monkey. Another photographer had a canary that sang on command. Mechanical birds were a favorite gimmick and “Watch the birdie” became a familiar refrain in studios across the country.

Magazines and newspaper ran ample advice for posing. An 1877 edition of The Chicago Inter-Ocean advised women with large mouths to say the word “Flip,” although one photographer preferred the word “Prunes.” If a small mouth was the problem the word “Cabbage” would make it appear larger.

Not everyone was enamored with cameras. One dog owner put up a sign warning “photographers and other tramps to stay away” after his dog had an unfortunate run-in with a tripod.

Did photography have a bearing on the suffragette movement? Indeed, it did, but it appeared to be more of a detriment than a help. The photographs of militant suffragettes or women dressed in bloomers did more harm than good.

If you think America was tough on suffragettes, think again. The women’s rights movement was considered the biggest threat to the British Empire. According to the National Archives the votes-for-women movement became the first "terrorist" organization subjected to secret surveillance photography in the world.

Photography has come a long way since those early daguerreotype days. One can only imagine what the brave souls of yesteryear would think of today’s “aim and click” cameras. Now days you can’t even drive down the street without having your picture taken. But as Lucy would say, Never leave the house unless you’re ready for your close up.

Speaking of photography, my publisher is running a “Vision of Funny” photograph contest with prizes. To enter go to margaretbrownleybooks facebook page and click on “Contests” under the book image. I think you also have to do something silly like click the “like” button. (just be sure you do it with a smile.) Hurry, contest ends July 13th.
http://www.margaretbrownley.com/

Question: Having your photograph taken in the 19th and early 20th centuries was serious business. A person might have only one photograph taken in a lifetime. How has the ease of taking pictures today changed your view of picture taking? Do you think we place more or less value on photographs today? Was there ever a time that you felt a camera was intrusive?












7 comments:

Salena Stormo said...

The book looks amazing! I can't wait to read it!


srstormo at yahoo dot com

Tina Radcliffe said...

Delightful post! I love Margaret's books. The covers, btw are always delightful too..a real promise of what's inside.

I heard Margaret speak at RWA once(okay long ago, I'm not telling the year) but she was INSPIRING!!

misskallie2000 said...

Great post. I love A Vision of Lucy and can't wait to read. I enjoy reading books that show women can do things men did not believe they could do and not only do it well but even better than a man.

Today more poople have cameras, both still and movie, that you see pic on FB, blogs, news, and of course Youtube. You never know if you might get famous just from your picture. With pics being sent from cell phones now it is used more as an invasion of privacy and bullying.

Thanks for the opportunity to enter this great giveaway.

misskallie2000 at yahoo dot com

Jo said...

This book looks great and would love to read it. Please enter me.

Blessings,
Jo
ladijo40(at)aol(dot)com

Patty Wysong said...

Can't wait to read this!!
Has the ease of photography changed how I value pictures? Most definitely! As a constant clicker, I'm thrilled. As one with the memory of a goldfish, pictures help me tremendously. But yes, cameras can be intrusive on moments packed with tremendous emotion--especially grief--and yet, those pictures are often the ones that move us the most. Maybe it's the baring of souls...

patterly atgmail dotcom

Margaret Brownley said...

Thank you all for checking in. It looks like most of you agree that cameras can be both helpful and intrusive. But does the camera tell the truth or hide it? After looking at all the happy photos of Caylee Anthony, you have to wonder...

Julie Lessman said...

A Vision of Lucy looks WONDERFUL, Margaret, so sign me up!! Thanks for the opportunity, Martha, as well.

I think the overabundance of photos today makes us place less value on photos, at least it does for me. I have about eight photo albums of the kids when they were little that I labored over, actually writing captions for each pic, but then I got busy and tired and old, and that all went by the wayside, leaving me with boxes and boxes of photos that I need to sort through. Uh, yeah, like THAT'S ever gonna happen!!

Now I see pics as more of a fun thing today with the ease of picture taking on cell phones.

Hugs,
Julie

gsus(at)charter(dot)net